House and Senate Republican leaders have diverged for years on how and whether to even respond to Donald Trump’s legal woes. “Nobody is above the law,” Barrasso tweeted. The third ranking GOP senator, John Barrasso of Wyoming, put out a statement Friday, saying, “This indictment certainly looks like an unequal application of justice.” House Republicans will hold this brazen weaponization of power accountable.” “I, and every American who believes in the rule of law, stand with President Trump against this grave injustice. Joe Biden kept classified documents for decades,” House Speaker Kevin McCarthy tweeted Thursday night. It is unconscionable for a President to indict the leading candidate opposing him. “Today is indeed a dark day for the United States of America. While the charges have yet to be unsealed, the top two Republicans in the Senate, Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, and Minority Whip John Thune have not put out statements, a stark contrast to the swift reaction among House GOP leaders who quickly rushed to Trump’s defense. Otherwise, mistakes or malicious bias from a single fact-checker could suppress the work of entire news outlets and deprive the public of the truth.The top two Republican leaders in the Senate remain silent a day after former President Donald Trump, the current GOP 2024 presidential frontrunner, was indicted by the federal government. If consensus amongst other partners is that a label was inaccurate and a story might instead warrant a lesser label or none at all, that new decision should be applied. If Facebook doesn’t want to be the arbiter of truth, it should still establish a process for a quorum of its fact-checking partners to play that role. A fact-checker would have to be formally rejected by the IFCN for violating its guidelines to lose its status as a Facebook partner. That leaves very little room for controversial or inaccurate labels to be rolled back. But when I followed up, Facebook clarified that publishers can only appeal the fact-checker that labeled them, and can’t appeal to other fact-checkers for a second decision or audit of the original label. It also noted that there’s an appeals process where publishers can reach out directly to a fact-checker to dispute a rating. This group publishes ethics guidelines that include an accuracy standard that requires checkers “maintain high standards of reporting, writing, and editing in order to produce work that is as error-free as possible.” Checkers are also supposed to follow criteria for determining story accuracy, and can apply mid-point labels like “Partly False” or “False Headline,” which The Daily Caller didn’t use here.įacebook tells me that because it doesn’t think it’s appropriate for it to be the arbiter of truth, it relies on the IFCN to set guidelines. When asked about this, Facebook deflected responsibility, implying the audit process wouldn’t be necessary because all of its fact-checking partners have been certified through the non-partisan International Fact-Checking Network. Perhaps Politico and NBC News’ headlines went too far, or perhaps the headlines fairly describe Trump’s characterization of the situation.īut the bigger concern is how Facebook has designed its fact-checking system to prevent other fact-checking partners from auditing the decision of The Daily Caller. Reputable fact-checking institution Snopes rated the claim that Trump called coronavirus a hoax as a mixture of true and false, noting, “Despite creating some confusion with his remarks, Trump did not call the coronavirus itself a hoax.” He could be calling coronavirus a hoax, concerns about its severity a hoax or Democrats’ criticism of his response a hoax. It’s hard to tell exactly what Trump means here. we’ve lost nobody, and you wonder, the press is in hysteria mode.“ And because of the fact that we went early, we went early, we could have had a lot more than that. But you know, we did something that’s been pretty amazing. It’s all turning, they lost, it’s all turning. They tried anything, they tried it over and over, they’ve been doing it since you got in. “ Now the Democrats are politicizing the coronavirus. Trump had said at a rally (emphasis ours): The fact-check explanation states that “Trump actually described complaints about his handling of the virus threat as a ‘hoax’. “Trump rallies his base to treat coronavirus as a ‘hoax’ ” from Politico, and “Trump calls coronavirus Democrats’ ‘new hoax’ ” from NBC News, as highlighted by Popular Information’s Judd Legum. This week, Check Your Fact rated two stories as false.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |